Success Beyond the Battlefield

Militaries throughout time have relied upon various styles of planning, training and rules. A truly outstanding strategy and set of values will be instilled in each man and woman in uniform and carried forward beyond their time of service to better impact the world. Sun Tzu of ancient China attempted to fulfill this by writing “The Art of War,” which is a meditation on the rules of war and military strategy. Similarly today, USNA and the Navy attempt to achieve victory on the battlefield and in society through specific codes and values. Due to its broader application to all military members, the strategy of USNA provides a more effective foundation for military members.

Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War” largely focuses on the importance of planning and decision-making on the battlefield. Throughout his work, he emphasizes the importance of strategizing before the actual battle, as war “is to be pondered carefully … [this is] the difference between survival and extinction” (2). Tzu centralizes his writing on “Five Fundamentals” of war: the Way, Heaven, Earth, command, and discipline. By fully grasping and internalizing these fundamentals, Tzu states that you will win; failure to grasp them will mean defeat. According to Tzu, victory or defeat largely rests on the leader. The general is in charge of knowing the Way, being on the side of Heaven and Earth, and instilling command and discipline. Strategizing and decision-making will ultimately be up to the person in charge, and soldiers are meant to follow their every word. Tzu’s final major argument is about capitalizing on your strengths and the enemy’s weaknesses, as he states that “if you know self, not the enemy, you will suffer defeat” (1).

USNA’s strategy has a similar set of goals and planning to that of Tzu. Close to the “Five Fundamentals,” USNA focuses on three core values of honor, courage and commitment. These values are supposed to be prevalent not only in our military careers, but in our personal relationships as well. It is the responsibility of each Navy enlisted and officer to “have an uncompromising code of integrity” and to “join together as a team to improve the quality of our work, our people, and ourselves” (1). Also similar to “The Art of War,” USNA emphasizes that war should not be taken lightly, as we remember our fallen brothers and sisters in uniform. One difference from Tzu’s strategy is while we are told that strategizing and planning is valuable, we are taught that it ultimately comes down to performance on the spot under stress. Additionally, the Navy’s set of values is more applicable to the entire chain of command, rather than just the general in charge. Every sailor and officer will be in charge of decision-making and authority should be questioned if there is a moral or legal violation.

It is clear that both techniques described by Tzu and USNA are successful. Tzu’s military philosophy has persisted through centuries and can be applied beyond battle to business, sports, and public-speaking skills. USNA’s strategy has similar success, as the US Navy has consistently been victorious on the battlefield and USNA has graduated some of the most impactful citizens in the US. While a blend of both techniques would be best, the Naval Academy’s strategy reigns supreme over Tzu’s “The Art of War”. The Navy’s set of values can be better applied to both followers and leaders, rather than the focus on solely generals in Tzu’s piece. Followers were only mentioned in Tzu’s piece to denote discipline and obedience, while USNA blends those aspects with active followership and taking responsibility throughout the chain of command.

Lauren McDonnell

Word Count: 600

Sources:

  1. “Annual Ethics Training,” Department of the Navy. Accessed 20 March 2019.
  2. Sun-tzu, “The Art of War.” Trans. John Minford. London: Penguin, 2009.

The Art of War and the United States Naval Academy

War is a constantly changing force. From sticks and stones, to bows and arrows, to bombs and missiles, man has continually pushed the limits of technology and innovation in order to devise the most efficient and deadly battle machine possible. As the tools of war advance, what of its philosophy? Its inherent rules and foundations? Since man has waged war, nothing has changed in these regards. What Sun Tzu speaks of regarding war in his work The Art of War still rings true in our world, and is still taught to the warriors of today; especially in a place such as the Naval Academy.

            Sun Tzu’s work is filled with messages of how to win in battle and dominate your enemies; but this is not his sole focus. He speaks of leadership and using adversaries own strengths and weaknesses against them: “the soldier’s spirit is keenest in the morning; by noon it has dulled…The skillful warrior avoids the keen spirit, attacks the dull.”[1] He discusses the definition of war, splitting it into “Five Fundamentals… The Way, Heaven, Earth, Command, [and] Discipline,” and even states that “The Skillful Strategist defeats the enemy without doing battle.”[2] In all, Sun Tzu’s work is a doctrine of how to run, maintain, and efficiently utilize a military force to achieve a means with as little loss and little effort as possible. He believed that the smarter and more capable the leader, as long as they know his ideals, will be victorious with the least effort possible. He exemplifies the teaching of “the easiest way to achieve a specific goal,” while still retaining a solid and respectable stance among both those who you are leading and those who lead you.[3]

            Since coming to the Naval Academy, I have seen that Sun Tzu’s teachings are inherent aspects of military learning. Excluding the topics of tactics and direct military strategy, which I have yet to truly experience or see put fully into effect, particulars such as the Five Fundamentals are the foundation of true military doctrine; especially for us here, since we will be the leaders that must uphold and represent these traits. These are what I see as the most effective teachings of Sun Tzu, as they for the base that leadership and respect are built off of. The Way is respect gained from those you lead, who will die following you onto any battlefield. Heaven is the changing tide that we must all learn to accept as part of our lives. Earth is the constant changing if the battlefield itself, pitting us either against powerful or nonexistent forces. Command and Discipline, the final two, are the most poignant. They embody what the United States military stands for, and what we are taught here: “wisdom, integrity, compassion, courage, severity… organization, chain of command, [and] control of expenditure.”[4] We are taught to live with integrity, honor, courage, and commitment here at the Academy. Seeing how much of an emphasis Sun Tzu put on these aspects is heartening; we are living by a code tried and tested for hundreds of years.

            Sun Tzu was a master of military knowledge, but also knew the makings of a phenomenal leader. His teachings are the basis of service, and it is apparent that the Naval Academy and beyond has built its culture around Sun Tzu’s ideals. It is exhilarating to be a part of such an ancient and time-honored tradition, and to be taught from the handbook of one of the greatest military leaders of all time.

Cyrus Malek-Madani

Word Count: 595


[1] Sun Tzu, The Art of War, Chapter 7.

[2] Ibid, Chapter 1.

[3] Clear, James, and James Clear, “Applying Lessons from Sun Tzu and The Art of War to Everyday Life,” Lifehacker. October 10, 2016, Accessed March 07, 2019, https://lifehacker.com/applying-lessons-from-sun-tzu-and-the-art-of-war-to-eve-1787621192.

[4] Sun Tzu, The Art of War, Chapter 1.

Sun Tzu and the Naval Academy

When reading Sun Tzu’s The Art of War, several similarities become apparent between his teachings, and what the Naval Academy strives to teach midshipmen. Within the first several stanzas it is easy to see that Sun Tzu values discipline as one of the most crucial aspects of a military leaders. While the Naval Academy does not focus explicitly on this trait, it can be seen very often in the teaching and way of life at the Academy.

In chapter one of The Art of War, Sun Tzu describes his five fundamentals with discipline being listed as the last of the five. According to Sun Tzu, discipline is “Organization/Chain of Command/Control of expenditure” (Art of War 4). Discipline is taught as one of the core principles at the Naval Academy and the importance of discipline is constantly emphasized. This begins over Plebe Summer when plebes are forced to recite several rates discussing discipline and its importance. Discipline is further reinforced at the Academy by the importance of organization. Organization is one of the most underappreciated skills developed at the academy. With the level of work and time management necessary to succeed, organized must be learned, and those who do not develop good organizational habits are bound to fall behind.

The next aspect that Sun Tzu lists as being a part of discipline is Chain of Command. Undoubtedly, proper utilization of the Chain of Command is one of the most emphasized teachings from the Naval Academy. Before even arriving at the academy, students are expected to know a portion of the chain of command from the president down to the Commandant of Midshipmen. After arriving, the chain of command grows and now includes midshipmen in billets appointed over the plebe class. Every semester these billet holders change creating a change in the chain of command. Any official paperwork must be sent through the chain of command, only moving one person at a time, so it is crucial for all midshipmen to know the members of their chain of chain very well.

The final aspect of discipline discussed by Sun Tzu is control of expenditure which is something taught very well at the Naval Academy. Control of expenditure simply means knowing how to be smart with money. At the Naval Academy this is accomplished by making nearly no income during the first year at the school. With only 100 dollars of income every month it can be exceedingly difficult to manage a budget properly. After the first year, students begin making a small amount more, but controlling expenditures remains a valuable skill that is taught every year until graduation.

-Brett Eckert

Word Count: 447

Master Sun

Molly Swiger

 

Sun Tzu’s Art of War has been regarded as one of the most influential military strategy texts in East Asian warfare since it was published in 5th century BCE. In Chinese culture, the sun is the epitome of ‘yang’ and represents heat vitality, Spring and East. It is important to note that Tzu was known as Master Sun: he represents goodness in Chinese culture and following his teachings will ensure success in battle. Sun Tzu’s over-arching philosophy focuses on victory through planning, with the strength of an army originating in its unity. Similarly, the Naval Academy aims to focus on the mental aspects of war and to “imbue them with the highest ideals of duty, honor, and loyalty.” While both philosophies are effective, the Naval Academy does not teach about military strategy, instead placing a greater focus on wholeness of the individual. Tzu emphasizes both the importance of strategy and character. Therefore, Tzu has a better philosophy.

The first chapter of The Art of War explains the making of plans. Tzu emphasizes the severity of war: “War is a grave affair of state; it is a place of life and death.” Without proper planning, a commander will not be prosperous. Understanding the fundamentals of war is a necessary step. Tzu states these essentials as: The Way, Heaven, Earth, Command, and Discipline. Because of how momentous war is, due consideration must be given to strategy. Plainly, Tzu declares “victory belongs to the side that scores most in the temple calculations before battle.” The Naval Academy puts Midshipmen through classes like Ethics, Leadership, Law, and History in order to foster this understanding of the gravity of war and the consequences of the decisions of officers. The mission statement is not singly focused; officers must be well versed in all aspects of war.

The third chapter of The Art of War describes the origins of strength. In battle, unity is congruent with strength. A focused, unified force will be stronger than a large, distracted army. This unity is developed through strategy. A commander who plans will conserve his troops and resources. In addition, he has to know his people and those who he is fighting against. Midshipmen, too, are taught to stress honor and loyalty. This loyalty refers to loyalty within a command and loyalty to the Constitution.

The seventh chapter of The Art of War discusses the risks of direct combat and exposes the greatest difference between Tzu’s principles and those taught at the Academy. Tzu discusses the drawbacks of pursuing an enemy in different terrain and the stresses it places on soldiers. He draws on the principles taught in previous chapters, as strategy is integral to find the balance of when to go and when to stay. Furthermore, war will favor a focused army because “the brave will not advance alone, nor will the fearful retreat alone.” It is the refusal of an army to lose its spirit that will lead to victory. Tzu argues a skillful warrior will possess mastery of spirit, mind, strength, and change. The Academy does not have classes that teach about military strategy or war planning. Thus, officers have to go to extra schooling to receive this knowledge.

Master Sun’s military strategy maintains a profound influence on both Eastern and Western philosophy with implications beyond the scope of war. Tzu describes what is required to be successful in battle and as a leader.

 

Word Count: 571

 

Work Cited:

“Nature Symbolism in Chinese Art.” Chinese Symbolism of Nature Elements, http://www.chinasage.info/symbols/nature.htm#XLXLSymSun.

“Plebe Summer Home.” The U.S. Naval Academy, http://www.usna.edu/PlebeSummer/index.php.

Sun-tzu, The Art of War. Trans. John Minford. London: Penguin, 2009.

Sun Tzu and the Naval Academy

In The Art of War, Sun Tzu explains the various ways an officer attains success in the military. The way Sun Tzu presents the topic of war, the reader gets the sense that Sun Tzu does not think of war as a violent or sought out engagement. In fact, Sun Tzu state that “better take an army…intact than destroy them”, suggesting that direct battle is not what we should strive for.  Instead, Sun Tzu speaks about strategy and deception. One common theme that could be found in each of Sun Tzu’s chapters is knowledge-knowledge of self and of the enemy. Sun Tzu places a general’s ability to succeed based on his awareness of his own strengths, the strengths of his men, the strengths of the enemy, and the awareness of how the surrounding environment can enhance or hinder each of these strengths.

Similarly, one technique we are taught at the Naval Academy is our ability to manage time. We must know where we exceed and where we struggle in order to know how to prioritize the tasks we are given with the limited time we have. For example, a midshipman who is already fit and can pass the PRT but struggles with academics will most likely put more time into their studies than in working because that is where they are weak.

I think both Sun Tzu and the Naval Academy teach a necessary and effective technique. As military officers we must be able to evaluate ourselves and our men, constantly seeking improvement. If we neglect to do this then we run the risk of remaining complacent. This lack of awareness also keeps us from either not using the combined talents of our forces to their fullest potential, or stretching ourselves too far to the point of breaking. I also think that knowing the enemy and understanding where their strengths and weaknesses lie allow us to strategize effectively.

In the beginning of Chapter One, Sun Tzu states that there are Five Fundamentals when thinking about war. One of these fundamentals is what Sun Tzu calls Command, described as “Wisdom; Integrity; Compassion; Courage; Severity.” Reading this I immediately thought of the ethics and leadership classes we are required to take, and the discussion of virtues in both of these classes. One thing that is stressed to us as midshipmen and future naval officers is the importance of virtues, and how knowing what our own virtues help us develop our leadership skills as well how we are influenced when making decisions as an officer in charge of Sailors and Marines. This another example of how the teachings of both Sun Tzu and the Naval Academy are in alignment with their view on what is most important when serving in the military and in war.  I do not think it is a coincidence that the teachings of the Naval Academy and those of Sun Tzu overlap, and both are effective in helping the officer comprehend the complete magnitude of war and the full impact the consequences of our actions can make.

Word Count: 508

Sun Tzu’s Philosophy Versus The US Military

In ancient China, a timeless work was written by Sun Tzu during the warring states period. Tzu’s The Art of War redefined unconventional warfare through mental strategy, and is still analyzed today by businesses and military schools including the Naval Academy. While Sun Tzu’s writings seem to stress the importance of using strategy over physical strength, modern teachings at military institutions like the Naval Academy believe that the best way to obtain peace is to prepare for war.

Sun Tzu was unique for his time and continues to have a presence in military teachings because of the bizarre ideas but exceptional leadership that he brought to the battlefield (1). For example, he mentions that in order to defeat your enemy “you must become your enemy” (2). This defies the idea that conquering your enemy means having a stronger army, and he reasons that a weaker army can still win. Tzu is also saying that the best way to ensure victory is to analyze the enemy and attack the weak points, similar to the way David defeated Goliath. This specialized form of battle strategy is why Sun Tzu was one of the most legendary Chinese generals- he recognized the importance of strategy over brute force.

At the Naval Academy, midshipmen are convinced from the very beginning of their careers that the strength of the Navy is the reason for our nation’s success. With an annual defense budget of over six hundred billion dollars (3), the United States spends more money on the military than the next seven countries combined. Compared to the rest of the world, America is Goliath. This being said, the US military does employ strategic deterrence through our nuclear weapons and this does align more with Sun Tzu’s teachings.

In my opinion, I believe that the strategy currently employed by the United States and taught at all of the service academies is the superior philosophy. While Sun Tzu’s The Art of War is important to consider with any military, his strategy is based on the conservation of resources- the most important being his men. However, the advancement of technology in warfighting capabilities and the lack of intense conflict in the world allows for soldiers’ life expectancy to increase dramatically. In addition, the virtually unlimited resources and funding of our military today is vastly larger than what Sun Tzu had access to, and therefore it can afford to focus on both unconventional warfare (in new areas like cyber defense) and power projection. With all of these factors considered, this is why the US hybrid philosophy that combines strength with deterrence is more effective.

 

Sources:

1.http://time.com/2801517/sun-tzus-art-of-war-how-ancient-strategy-can-lead-to-modern-success/

2.https://www.pgpf.org/chart-archive/0053_defense-comparison

3. Sun Tzu’s The Art of War

 

Word Count: 432

 

Blog 4

The over-arching philosophy of Sun Tzu’s Art of War is to use intellect rather than force. “Ultimate excellence lies/ Not in winning/Every battle/But in defeating the enemy/ Without ever fighting. / The highest form of warfare/ Is to attack/ Strategy itself”. Tzu’s believes mental intelligence is a more vital skill than physical strength in war. In fact, a physical fight should not be the first resort, or to be resorted to at all. The philosophy of this book understands and respects that to win a war is more than death. Instead, it is careful strategic planning with consideration for the enemy.
The Naval Academy emulates Sun Tzu’s ideas presented in the book. As future leaders of our Nation’s sailors and marines, intellect is highly valued. We focus on building our intelligence to be capable war-fighters in all scenarios. Our strength relies on our preparedness and allows us to become better officers. We are forced to think about all scenarios and think of how we can best defeat the enemy. We also do not forget about the physical mission. At the academy, we do our best to prepare for the challenges that lay ahead. We are taught to not control our emotions. A leader has control over the welfare of his troops. “Victory belongs to the side/ That scores most/ In the temple calculations/ Before battle.” While defeat is those who score lower in calculations. Tzu does not allow pride to weaken troops. “If equally matched, / Fight it out; / If fewer in number, / Lie low;/ If weaker, / Escape.” Though escaping is usually recognized as a sign of weakness, the author points out that it is ok. It is smarter to evade the enemy when one recognizes itself as weak. It is better to gather troops and organize a fair fight. It is recognized that having a fair fight was highly values, today it is not like that. Our enemies do not hold the same values we do, but that does not mean we need to stoop to their level. The U.S. military continues to follow a high ethical code.
I think between the different service communities they are all well balanced in our readiness for the future. Though the emphasis between communities differs, intellect is held in high regard. The Naval Academy follows Sun Tzu’s Art of War through our careful, well thought out curriculum and leadership opportunities.

WC: 401

Sun Tzu vs. USNA

The philosophy laid out by Sun Tzu demands much of a military leader. He claims that the best way to defeat your enemy is to capture them without fighting. It is a peaceful strategy focused on leaving the opponent’s army and nation intact rather than recklessly obliterating them. He describes is as “the method of attacking by stratagem of using the sheathed sword.” Ideally, a general would prevent an enemy’s plans from occurring entirely and at very worst, a general would besiege a city with a lengthy operation. Sun Tzu does, however, describe certain scenarios where it is reasonable to attack the enemy, such as when their army is anything less than five times as large as the enemy’s. When their army is inferior in numbers to that of the enemy, he claims that the enemy’s army must be avoided, and if inferior in every way, they should flee.

At the Naval Academy, we learn in courses such as ethics, the meaning of just war and proportionality. Ideally, we use only enough force as is required to accomplish the mission. Excessive force leads to unnecessary destruction and, potentially, to loss of life. This teaching is in accordance with Sun Tzu’s philosophy. Where our philosophy differs is in the notion of being outnumbered. Whereas Sun Tzu recommends fleeing from the enemy, we are taught to fight against all odds to defeat the enemy. This can be done through superior planning, training, and determination. This actually agrees with Tzu’s statement “he will win who, prepared himself, waits to take the enemy unprepared.” The Navy, as a whole, takes preparation very seriously, so as not to be outwitted by the enemy.

If the assumption were made that the United States military was actually inferior in every way to the force of one of our enemy’s, I believe our military would show courage and face the enemy against the odds. Such was the case during the Revolutionary War. There are examples in the modern age, however, where it is wise to negotiate with an enemy instead of attacking them, even if U.S. forces appear to be superior. For example, it would be dangerous to attack a country that possesses nuclear weapons. If the entirety of their nuclear arsenal is not destroyed, they could potentially use such a weapon in retaliation. This scenario, called mutually assured destruction, is a limiting factor on how the United States can use its force, and was not a relevant factor during the time of Sun Tzu. Sun Tzu’s statement “he will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight” holds relevant with this case.

Much of what Sun Tzu states in “The Art of War” holds true to what we are taught at the Naval Academy. The one major difference lies in being outnumbered. We are taught to be courageous, striving for tactical superiority, when the odds are against us, yet wise in recognizing when our force could spark worldwide destruction.

Matt Malone

Sources: Sun Tzu’s The Art of War

Word count: 495

Mongolian Conquest

The Mongolian Empire draws some very interesting parallels to the Empire from the Star Wars saga. In the Star Wars saga, the Empire is depicted as the catalyst for war and fear throughout the span of space. Their ultimate goal was control of the entire universe, taking out one planet at a time. Similarly, the Mongolian Empire was hungry for conquest as well. Strategically, both empires carried similarities as well. In the saga, Emperor Palpatine and Darth Vader’s empire plans to control the universe by taking over planets one-by-one. Genghis Khan also carried this trait as well. As the Mongols pushed West, hoping to one day conquer Europe, they took over civilizations one at a time.

Using superior military tactics and complete slaughter of the opposition, the Mongols used their power to take what they wanted. They used tactics, like cavalry and catapults, to gain an advantage over their opposition. I think this is an interesting parallel to the Empire as well, as they also used military force and technology to gain an advantage. For example, the Empire, under direction of Palpatine, built a superior weapon known as the Death Star that could destroy entire planets. They used this to their advantage to begin the spread of their rule.

Another similarity between the two is a creation of an identity for the empires. In Star Wars, the Empire, and those aligned with its cause, become a community over the idea that they will one day rule the universe. This mutual identity bonds them and creates a sense of unity amongst those believing in one cause, even if they are from different planets entirely. Similarly, Genghis Khan helped form this sense of community in the Mongolian rule as well. Before the Mongols were unified, they were a nomad people consisting of many tribes that were not often associated with one another as a sole community. However, Khan gave them a sense of unity and a cause that the Mongols rallied around and began to work together.

One final similarity between the two is that the end of both empires can be traced back to a specific event. In Star Wars, the Empire is effectively defeated after Luke Skywalker and the Rebellion destroy the Death Star and stop their conquest across the galaxy. The Mongolians are dismantled at the Battle of Ayn Jalut, which pretty much put the nail in the coffin for the empire. Ogedei Khan had died on the conquest to Europe, which halted the advance, and the defeat at Ayn Jalut dismantled the empire completely years later.

Similarities can be found between the Empire and our own government today, as well. For example, our nation plays a role as the “global peacekeeper” to other nations. We enter into conflicts solely to attempt to keep peace and to also showcase our power. Similarly, this is what the Empire does as well. The Rebels resist the establishment of the Empire and fight for their freedoms and what they think is right. According to the Odyssey, the rebels can be compared to groups like ISIS today. They play this part because they are “fighting for what they deem a ‘just cause.’” However, both the United States and the Empire attempt to quiet these groups for their own causes. Additionally, the United States attempts to control the beliefs and actions of other nations, much like the Empire did. As the Empire destroys and conquers planet after planet in the Star Wars universe, Princess Leia says a memorable quote to Grand Moff Tarkin: “The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.” This is an interesting metaphor we can make for our current stance on being a global peacekeeper. I believe this is a debate worth having, whether the risks of being this dominant super power are worth all of the conflicts we find ourselves in.

Word Count: 648

Sources:

https://www.theodysseyonline.com/the-empire-and-trump

Blog Post 4

In Sun Tzu’s Art of War the overarching philosophy seems to be one of execution and care. It is stated in the “Laying Plans” section, the first topic in the book that “the art of war is of vital importance to the State.” The quote symbolizes the importance of tactical decisions, and careful consideration from military commanders to perform their duties. This is an important lesson taught to us at the Naval Academy through our leadership and ethics classes, but also through our military professors who take the time to share their experiences with us.

The part that stands out most to me is point three in this section. It speaks of “Five Constant Factors” in which the art of war is governed. The five points include “The Moral Law; Heaven; Earth; The Commander; Method and Discipline.” In our leadership classes we are constantly asked questions regarding moral decisions, and how to lead sailors and marines properly. This is a foundation that the Naval Academy tries to teach us, because it is imperative for decision making in stressful situations. I believe Sun Tzu understood this and wanted his soldiers to practice this in combat situations. As for heaven and earth I believe that aligns more with the spiritual side of an individual; at the Naval Academy we are free to practice our own spiritual beliefs, and that helps reinforce the moral side of things. It is hard to make moral decisions if one doesn’t look inside their self for improvements, and it is hard to earn respect from subordinates if they do not do this.

The Commander is a huge aspect in the United States military. We are taught from day one to take respect anyone of superior rank. For example, on I-Day we take the oath which states we will “obey the orders of those appointed over us,” this ranges from officers all the way to the President. In order to have a strong, tactful force the members of that force must have full faith and allegiance to its commanders. Wang Tzu is quoted with “Without constant practice (speaking of moral law), the officers will be nervous and undecided when mustering for battle,” strengthening the importance of faith in commanders. If the forces see a nervous leader they will lose confidence, and this is the reason that confidence is pounded in our brains. This confidence is based upon point five, method and discipline. Obviously, our methods and discipline have evolved over time, but both have importance in our respective forces. The stronger discipline and proven methods create confidence, and for a powerful, well trained force, these attributes create a deadly force.

It is impressive to see parallels between the forces of today and yesterday. To see these parallels just reinforces the necessity of a strong foundation.

 

Word Count: 467

http://www.idph.com.br/conteudos/ebooks/suntzu10.pdf