Militaries throughout time have relied upon various styles of planning, training and rules. A truly outstanding strategy and set of values will be instilled in each man and woman in uniform and carried forward beyond their time of service to better impact the world. Sun Tzu of ancient China attempted to fulfill this by writing “The Art of War,” which is a meditation on the rules of war and military strategy. Similarly today, USNA and the Navy attempt to achieve victory on the battlefield and in society through specific codes and values. Due to its broader application to all military members, the strategy of USNA provides a more effective foundation for military members.
Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War” largely focuses on the importance of planning and decision-making on the battlefield. Throughout his work, he emphasizes the importance of strategizing before the actual battle, as war “is to be pondered carefully … [this is] the difference between survival and extinction” (2). Tzu centralizes his writing on “Five Fundamentals” of war: the Way, Heaven, Earth, command, and discipline. By fully grasping and internalizing these fundamentals, Tzu states that you will win; failure to grasp them will mean defeat. According to Tzu, victory or defeat largely rests on the leader. The general is in charge of knowing the Way, being on the side of Heaven and Earth, and instilling command and discipline. Strategizing and decision-making will ultimately be up to the person in charge, and soldiers are meant to follow their every word. Tzu’s final major argument is about capitalizing on your strengths and the enemy’s weaknesses, as he states that “if you know self, not the enemy, you will suffer defeat” (1).
USNA’s strategy has a similar set of goals and planning to that of Tzu. Close to the “Five Fundamentals,” USNA focuses on three core values of honor, courage and commitment. These values are supposed to be prevalent not only in our military careers, but in our personal relationships as well. It is the responsibility of each Navy enlisted and officer to “have an uncompromising code of integrity” and to “join together as a team to improve the quality of our work, our people, and ourselves” (1). Also similar to “The Art of War,” USNA emphasizes that war should not be taken lightly, as we remember our fallen brothers and sisters in uniform. One difference from Tzu’s strategy is while we are told that strategizing and planning is valuable, we are taught that it ultimately comes down to performance on the spot under stress. Additionally, the Navy’s set of values is more applicable to the entire chain of command, rather than just the general in charge. Every sailor and officer will be in charge of decision-making and authority should be questioned if there is a moral or legal violation.
It is clear that both techniques described by Tzu and USNA are successful. Tzu’s military philosophy has persisted through centuries and can be applied beyond battle to business, sports, and public-speaking skills. USNA’s strategy has similar success, as the US Navy has consistently been victorious on the battlefield and USNA has graduated some of the most impactful citizens in the US. While a blend of both techniques would be best, the Naval Academy’s strategy reigns supreme over Tzu’s “The Art of War”. The Navy’s set of values can be better applied to both followers and leaders, rather than the focus on solely generals in Tzu’s piece. Followers were only mentioned in Tzu’s piece to denote discipline and obedience, while USNA blends those aspects with active followership and taking responsibility throughout the chain of command.
Lauren McDonnell
Word Count: 600
Sources:
- “Annual Ethics Training,” Department of the Navy. Accessed 20 March 2019.
- Sun-tzu, “The Art of War.” Trans. John Minford. London: Penguin, 2009.